← Back to Analysis Directory Sample Report: Product Price Elasticity Analysis

Context and Data Preparation

Analysis Overview and Data Quality

OV

Analysis Overview

Price Elasticity Analysis Configuration

Analysis overview and configuration

Price Elasticity
E-commerce Analytics
Estimate price elasticity of demand for Shopify products to optimize pricing strategy
Module Configuration
min_observations 10
time_aggregation week
exclude_outliers_sd 3
confidence_level 0.95
Processing ID
test_1766619639
IN

Key Insights

Analysis Overview

Purpose

This section provides insights into the key metrics and data characteristics of the Shopify Product Price Elasticity Analysis conducted by E-commerce Analytics on December 24, 2025.

Key Findings

  • Average Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates that, on average, a 1% increase in price leads to a 1.51% decrease in quantity demanded.
  • Percentage of Elastic Products: 83.33% - Shows that the majority of products analyzed are price-sensitive.
  • Overall R-squared: 0.869 - Indicates that the regression model explains 86.9% of the variability in quantity demanded.

Interpretation

The analysis successfully estimated price elasticity, highlighting that most products are price-sensitive. The high R-squared value suggests a strong fit of the regression model in explaining demand variation based on price changes.

Context

The analysis assumes a log-linear relationship between price and quantity, constant elasticity, and independent observations across products. Limitations include the lack of historical sales data and consideration of cross-price elasticity between products.

IN

Key Insights

Analysis Overview

Purpose

This section provides insights into the key metrics and data characteristics of the Shopify Product Price Elasticity Analysis conducted by E-commerce Analytics on December 24, 2025.

Key Findings

  • Average Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates that, on average, a 1% increase in price leads to a 1.51% decrease in quantity demanded.
  • Percentage of Elastic Products: 83.33% - Shows that the majority of products analyzed are price-sensitive.
  • Overall R-squared: 0.869 - Indicates that the regression model explains 86.9% of the variability in quantity demanded.

Interpretation

The analysis successfully estimated price elasticity, highlighting that most products are price-sensitive. The high R-squared value suggests a strong fit of the regression model in explaining demand variation based on price changes.

Context

The analysis assumes a log-linear relationship between price and quantity, constant elasticity, and independent observations across products. Limitations include the lack of historical sales data and consideration of cross-price elasticity between products.

PP

Data Preprocessing

Data Quality & Product Filtering

30
Final Products

Data preprocessing and column mapping

Data Pipeline
173
Initial Records
30
Clean Records
Column Mapping
product_name
Title
price
Variant Price
inventory_qty
Variant Inventory Qty
vendor
Vendor
product_type
Type
30 Records
MCP Analytics
IN

Key Insights

Data Preprocessing

Purpose

This section outlines the data preprocessing steps, including data quality checks, retention rate, and the impact of data cleaning on the dataset used for analysis.

Key Findings

  • Initial Rows: 173 - The original dataset size before cleaning
  • Final Rows: 30 - The number of rows retained after data cleaning
  • Rows Removed: 143 - The count of rows removed during preprocessing
  • Retention Rate: 17.3% - Percentage of data retained after cleaning

Interpretation

The significant reduction in data points (143 out of 173 removed) indicates a rigorous data cleaning process. The 17.3% retention rate suggests that the analysis is now based on a more refined and potentially more reliable subset of the original data.

Context

The data preprocessing decisions directly impact the accuracy and reliability of the price elasticity analysis. By removing outliers and irrelevant data points, the analysis can focus on a more representative sample, potentially leading to more accurate insights for optimizing pricing strategies.

IN

Key Insights

Data Preprocessing

Purpose

This section outlines the data preprocessing steps, including data quality checks, retention rate, and the impact of data cleaning on the dataset used for analysis.

Key Findings

  • Initial Rows: 173 - The original dataset size before cleaning
  • Final Rows: 30 - The number of rows retained after data cleaning
  • Rows Removed: 143 - The count of rows removed during preprocessing
  • Retention Rate: 17.3% - Percentage of data retained after cleaning

Interpretation

The significant reduction in data points (143 out of 173 removed) indicates a rigorous data cleaning process. The 17.3% retention rate suggests that the analysis is now based on a more refined and potentially more reliable subset of the original data.

Context

The data preprocessing decisions directly impact the accuracy and reliability of the price elasticity analysis. By removing outliers and irrelevant data points, the analysis can focus on a more representative sample, potentially leading to more accurate insights for optimizing pricing strategies.

Executive Summary

Key Findings and Pricing Recommendations

TLDR

Executive Summary

Key Findings & Pricing Recommendations

30
Products Analyzed

Key Performance Indicators

Total products analyzed
30
Avg elasticity
-1.51
Pct elastic products
83.33
Pct inelastic products
16.67
Overall r squared
86.9%
Avg price
123.18
Price range min
19.95
Price range max
299.95

Key Findings

Key findings

Finding Value
Products Analyzed 30
Average Elasticity -1.51
Elastic Products (%) 83.3%
Inelastic Products (%) 16.7%
Model Quality (R²) 0.869
Average Price $123.18
Price Range $19.95 - $299.95
Date Range 2025-09-25 to 2025-12-24

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: Price elasticity analysis of 30 products shows average elasticity of -1.51 with 83.3% elastic and 16.7% inelastic products. Model quality R-squared of 0.869 indicates strong predictive power.

Analysis Summary:
• Products Analyzed: 30
• Date Range: 2025-09-25 to 2025-12-24
• Average Elasticity: -1.51 (83.3% elastic, 16.7% inelastic)
• Price Range: $19.95 to $299.95 (avg: $123.18)
• Model Quality: R-squared = 0.869 (excellent fit)

Key Insights:
Elastic products (< -1): 83.3% - demand highly responsive to price
Inelastic products (> -1): 16.7% - demand stable despite price changes
• Products with excellent model fit (R² > 0.8): Use for confident pricing decisions
• Products with weak fit (R² < 0.4): Require additional analysis or data

Strategic Recommendation:
Your product mix is predominantly elastic (83.3% of products). Customers are highly price-sensitive and will shift to competitors with price increases. Recommended action: Maintain competitive pricing on elastic products. Consider strategic price reductions on highly elastic items (elasticity < -1.5) to drive volume gains and market share. Focus on operational efficiency to maintain margins at competitive price points.

IN

Key Insights

Executive Summary

Purpose

This section provides a concise overview of the key metrics and findings from the price elasticity analysis, focusing on the average elasticity, distribution of elastic and inelastic products, model quality, and price range.

Key Findings

  • Average Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates the overall responsiveness of demand to price changes.
  • Elastic Products (%): 83.3% - Majority of products show high price sensitivity.
  • Inelastic Products (%): 16.7% - Products with relatively stable demand despite price variations.
  • Model Quality (R-squared): 0.869 - Strong predictive power of the model.

Interpretation

The analysis reveals that the product mix is predominantly price-sensitive, with most products exhibiting elasticity. This suggests that customers are likely to adjust their purchasing behavior in response to price changes, emphasizing the importance of strategic pricing decisions to optimize revenue and market share.

Context

The findings highlight the need to maintain competitive pricing on elastic products and consider price reductions on highly elastic items to drive volume gains. It’s crucial to leverage the model’s predictive power for confident pricing decisions while acknowledging the limitations of assuming constant elasticity and independent observations.

IN

Key Insights

Executive Summary

Purpose

This section provides a concise overview of the key metrics and findings from the price elasticity analysis, focusing on the average elasticity, distribution of elastic and inelastic products, model quality, and price range.

Key Findings

  • Average Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates the overall responsiveness of demand to price changes.
  • Elastic Products (%): 83.3% - Majority of products show high price sensitivity.
  • Inelastic Products (%): 16.7% - Products with relatively stable demand despite price variations.
  • Model Quality (R-squared): 0.869 - Strong predictive power of the model.

Interpretation

The analysis reveals that the product mix is predominantly price-sensitive, with most products exhibiting elasticity. This suggests that customers are likely to adjust their purchasing behavior in response to price changes, emphasizing the importance of strategic pricing decisions to optimize revenue and market share.

Context

The findings highlight the need to maintain competitive pricing on elastic products and consider price reductions on highly elastic items to drive volume gains. It’s crucial to leverage the model’s predictive power for confident pricing decisions while acknowledging the limitations of assuming constant elasticity and independent observations.

Price-Demand Relationship

Log-Log Elasticity Curves and Regression Fit

EC

Price-Demand Curve

Log-Log Elasticity Relationship

Log-log price-demand relationship showing elasticity as slope of regression line

IN

Key Insights

Price-Demand Curve

Purpose

This section visualizes the price-demand curve on a log-log scale, where the slope of the regression line represents the elasticity coefficient. It helps identify elastic products (highly responsive to price changes) and inelastic products (less responsive) among the 30 analyzed products.

Key Findings

  • Mean Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates an average price elasticity of demand across the products.
  • Percentage of Elastic Products: 83.33% - Shows that the majority of products are elastic.
  • Price Range: Average price of $123.18 with a minimum of $19.95 and a maximum of $299.95.

Interpretation

The high percentage of elastic products suggests that most items in the Shopify store have demand sensitive to price changes. The average elasticity of -1.51 indicates that, on average, a 1% increase in price leads to a 1.51% decrease in quantity demanded, highlighting the importance of pricing strategy optimization for revenue maximization.

Context

The analysis assumes a log-linear relationship between price and quantity, constant elasticity, and independent observations across products. Limitations include the lack of historical sales data and consideration of cross-price elasticity between products.

IN

Key Insights

Price-Demand Curve

Purpose

This section visualizes the price-demand curve on a log-log scale, where the slope of the regression line represents the elasticity coefficient. It helps identify elastic products (highly responsive to price changes) and inelastic products (less responsive) among the 30 analyzed products.

Key Findings

  • Mean Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates an average price elasticity of demand across the products.
  • Percentage of Elastic Products: 83.33% - Shows that the majority of products are elastic.
  • Price Range: Average price of $123.18 with a minimum of $19.95 and a maximum of $299.95.

Interpretation

The high percentage of elastic products suggests that most items in the Shopify store have demand sensitive to price changes. The average elasticity of -1.51 indicates that, on average, a 1% increase in price leads to a 1.51% decrease in quantity demanded, highlighting the importance of pricing strategy optimization for revenue maximization.

Context

The analysis assumes a log-linear relationship between price and quantity, constant elasticity, and independent observations across products. Limitations include the lack of historical sales data and consideration of cross-price elasticity between products.

Product Elasticity Comparison

Price Sensitivity Analysis Across Products

PC

Product Elasticity Comparison

Elasticity Coefficients by Product

Elasticity coefficients by product showing which items are price-sensitive vs price-insensitive

IN

Key Insights

Product Elasticity Comparison

Purpose

This section highlights the distribution of price elasticity among products, categorizing them as elastic or inelastic based on their responsiveness to price changes. Understanding this breakdown is crucial for devising a targeted pricing strategy to maximize revenue.

Key Findings

  • Elastic Products: 83.3% - Products with elasticity < -1, indicating demand decreases more than price increases.
  • Inelastic Products: 16.7% - Products with elasticity between -1 and 0, showing relatively stable demand despite price changes.
  • Average Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates a significant price-demand relationship across products.

Interpretation

The high percentage of elastic products suggests that small price adjustments can have a substantial impact on demand. Leveraging this insight, businesses can strategically adjust prices to optimize revenue based on the elasticity of each product.

Context

These findings align with the objective of estimating price elasticity to enhance the pricing strategy for Shopify products. The segmentation of products based on elasticity levels provides a clear direction for pricing adjustments to achieve the desired revenue optimization.

IN

Key Insights

Product Elasticity Comparison

Purpose

This section highlights the distribution of price elasticity among products, categorizing them as elastic or inelastic based on their responsiveness to price changes. Understanding this breakdown is crucial for devising a targeted pricing strategy to maximize revenue.

Key Findings

  • Elastic Products: 83.3% - Products with elasticity < -1, indicating demand decreases more than price increases.
  • Inelastic Products: 16.7% - Products with elasticity between -1 and 0, showing relatively stable demand despite price changes.
  • Average Elasticity: -1.51 - Indicates a significant price-demand relationship across products.

Interpretation

The high percentage of elastic products suggests that small price adjustments can have a substantial impact on demand. Leveraging this insight, businesses can strategically adjust prices to optimize revenue based on the elasticity of each product.

Context

These findings align with the objective of estimating price elasticity to enhance the pricing strategy for Shopify products. The segmentation of products based on elasticity levels provides a clear direction for pricing adjustments to achieve the desired revenue optimization.

Model Validation

Regression Fit Quality and Prediction Accuracy

MV

Model Fit Quality

Actual vs Predicted Demand

Model accuracy assessment comparing predicted vs actual demand to validate elasticity estimates

IN

Key Insights

Model Fit Quality

Purpose

This section evaluates the accuracy of the regression model by comparing predicted and actual demand, providing insights into the reliability of the elasticity estimates.

Key Findings

  • Overall R-squared: 0.869 - Indicates the proportion of variation in demand explained by the model.
  • Residual Mean: 26.12 - The average difference between predicted and actual quantities.
  • Systematic Deviations: Presence of systematic deviations may suggest model limitations or missing variables.

Interpretation

The high R-squared value suggests that the model explains a significant portion of demand variation. However, the residual mean indicates some discrepancies between predicted and actual quantities, highlighting areas where the model may need refinement.

Context

Understanding the discrepancies between predicted and actual demand is crucial for refining the pricing strategy based on accurate elasticity estimates. Systematic deviations may indicate the need to consider additional factors like seasonality or competitor pricing for a more comprehensive analysis.

IN

Key Insights

Model Fit Quality

Purpose

This section evaluates the accuracy of the regression model by comparing predicted and actual demand, providing insights into the reliability of the elasticity estimates.

Key Findings

  • Overall R-squared: 0.869 - Indicates the proportion of variation in demand explained by the model.
  • Residual Mean: 26.12 - The average difference between predicted and actual quantities.
  • Systematic Deviations: Presence of systematic deviations may suggest model limitations or missing variables.

Interpretation

The high R-squared value suggests that the model explains a significant portion of demand variation. However, the residual mean indicates some discrepancies between predicted and actual quantities, highlighting areas where the model may need refinement.

Context

Understanding the discrepancies between predicted and actual demand is crucial for refining the pricing strategy based on accurate elasticity estimates. Systematic deviations may indicate the need to consider additional factors like seasonality or competitor pricing for a more comprehensive analysis.

Revenue Impact Scenarios

What-If Analysis for Price Changes

RS

Revenue Impact Scenarios

Price Change vs Revenue Impact

Simulated revenue impact of price changes under different elasticity scenarios

IN

Key Insights

Revenue Impact Scenarios

Purpose

This section illustrates the simulated revenue impact of price changes under different elasticity scenarios. It helps identify optimal pricing strategies by showing how revenue changes with price adjustments for products with varying elasticities.

Key Findings

  • Mean Revenue Change: 0.48% - On average, revenue changes by 0.48% across all price adjustments.
  • Elastic Products: Revenue decreases with price increases, maximizing at lower price points.
  • Inelastic Products: Revenue grows with price increases, indicating potential for profit optimization.

Interpretation

The metrics reveal how revenue responds to price changes based on product elasticity. Understanding these dynamics can guide pricing decisions to maximize revenue for each product segment, aligning with the goal of optimizing the pricing strategy for Shopify products.

Context

These simulations provide valuable insights into revenue dynamics under different pricing scenarios, aiding in the estimation of price elasticity and the formulation of effective pricing strategies. However, the analysis assumes constant elasticity and does not consider external factors like seasonality or promotions.

IN

Key Insights

Revenue Impact Scenarios

Purpose

This section illustrates the simulated revenue impact of price changes under different elasticity scenarios. It helps identify optimal pricing strategies by showing how revenue changes with price adjustments for products with varying elasticities.

Key Findings

  • Mean Revenue Change: 0.48% - On average, revenue changes by 0.48% across all price adjustments.
  • Elastic Products: Revenue decreases with price increases, maximizing at lower price points.
  • Inelastic Products: Revenue grows with price increases, indicating potential for profit optimization.

Interpretation

The metrics reveal how revenue responds to price changes based on product elasticity. Understanding these dynamics can guide pricing decisions to maximize revenue for each product segment, aligning with the goal of optimizing the pricing strategy for Shopify products.

Context

These simulations provide valuable insights into revenue dynamics under different pricing scenarios, aiding in the estimation of price elasticity and the formulation of effective pricing strategies. However, the analysis assumes constant elasticity and does not consider external factors like seasonality or promotions.

Pricing Recommendations

Actionable Pricing Guidance by Product

PR

Pricing Recommendations

Actionable Pricing Guidance by Product

30
Products with Recommendations

Actionable pricing recommendations based on elasticity analysis

Product Elasticity Category Recommendation Confidence
ADIDAS | CLASSIC BACKPACK -0.92 inelastic Price increase opportunity (inelastic) High
ADIDAS | CLASSIC BACKPACK | LEGEND INK MULTICOLOUR -1.59 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
ADIDAS | KID'S STAN SMITH -1.35 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) Medium
ADIDAS | SUPERSTAR 80S -1.02 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
ASICS TIGER | GEL-LYTE V '30 YEARS OF GEL' PACK -1.79 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
CONVERSE | CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR II HI -1.45 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
CONVERSE | CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR LO -0.98 inelastic Price increase opportunity (inelastic) Medium
CONVERSE | TODDLER CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR AXEL MID -1.37 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
DR MARTENS | 1460Z DMC 8-EYE BOOT | CHERRY SMOOTH -1.64 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
DR MARTENS | 1461 DMC 3-EYE SHOE | BLACK SMOOTH -1.80 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
DR MARTENS | CAVENDISH 3-EYE SHOE BLACK -1.73 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
FLEX FIT | MINI OTTOMAN BLACK -0.79 inelastic Price increase opportunity (inelastic) Medium
HERSCHEL | IONA -1.91 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume Medium
NIKE | CRACKLE PRINT TB TEE -1.40 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) Medium
NIKE | SWOOSH PRO FLAT PEAK CAP -1.65 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
NIKE | TODDLER ROSHE ONE -0.92 inelastic Price increase opportunity (inelastic) Medium
PALLADIUM | PALLATECH HI TX | CHEVRON -1.92 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
PUMA | SUEDE CLASSIC REGAL -2.43 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
SUPRA | MENS VAIDER -2.17 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
TIMBERLAND | MENS 6 INCH PREMIUM BOOT -0.91 inelastic Price increase opportunity (inelastic) Medium
VANS | ERA 59 MOROCCAN | GEO/DRESS BLUES -1.48 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
VANS | AUTHENTIC (BUTTERFLY) TRUE | WHITE / BLACK -1.85 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
VANS | AUTHENTIC | (MULTI EYELETS) | GRADIENT/CRIMSON -1.67 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
VANS | CLASSIC SLIP-ON (PERFORATED SUEDE) -1.45 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
VANS | ERA 59 (DESERT COWBOY) -1.11 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
VANS | OLD SKOOL (BUTTERFLY) TRUE WHITE | BLACK -1.88 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
VANS | SH-8 HI -1.74 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
VANS | SK8-HI DECON (CUTOUT)| LEAVES/WHITE -2.08 elastic Consider price decrease to boost volume High
VANS |AUTHENTIC | LO PRO | BURGANDY/WHITE -1.13 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
VANS APPAREL AND ACCESSORIES | CLASSIC SUPER NO SHOW SOCKS 3 PACK WHITE -1.08 elastic Maintain competitive pricing (elastic) High
IN

Key Insights

Pricing Recommendations

Purpose

This section provides strategic pricing recommendations for 30 analyzed products based on their price elasticity. It aims to guide pricing decisions by highlighting opportunities for price adjustments to maximize revenue and volume while maintaining competitive positioning.

Key Findings

  • Price Elasticity Distribution: 83.33% of products are elastic, suggesting potential volume gains with price reductions.
  • Average Elasticity: The average elasticity is -1.51, indicating a moderate responsiveness of quantity demanded to price changes.
  • Revenue Impact: Price increase opportunities exist for inelastic products, while volume optimization can be achieved through price decreases for highly elastic products.

Interpretation

The analysis reveals that most products exhibit elastic demand, indicating the potential for volume growth with price reductions. Products with inelastic demand present opportunities for price increases to maximize revenue. Maintaining competitive pricing on moderately elastic products can help sustain market positioning.

Context

These pricing recommendations are based on the assumption of a log-linear relationship between price and quantity, aiming to estimate price elasticity for optimizing the pricing strategy of Shopify products. The confidence levels associated with the recommendations reflect the statistical reliability of the model fit.

IN

Key Insights

Pricing Recommendations

Purpose

This section provides strategic pricing recommendations for 30 analyzed products based on their price elasticity. It aims to guide pricing decisions by highlighting opportunities for price adjustments to maximize revenue and volume while maintaining competitive positioning.

Key Findings

  • Price Elasticity Distribution: 83.33% of products are elastic, suggesting potential volume gains with price reductions.
  • Average Elasticity: The average elasticity is -1.51, indicating a moderate responsiveness of quantity demanded to price changes.
  • Revenue Impact: Price increase opportunities exist for inelastic products, while volume optimization can be achieved through price decreases for highly elastic products.

Interpretation

The analysis reveals that most products exhibit elastic demand, indicating the potential for volume growth with price reductions. Products with inelastic demand present opportunities for price increases to maximize revenue. Maintaining competitive pricing on moderately elastic products can help sustain market positioning.

Context

These pricing recommendations are based on the assumption of a log-linear relationship between price and quantity, aiming to estimate price elasticity for optimizing the pricing strategy of Shopify products. The confidence levels associated with the recommendations reflect the statistical reliability of the model fit.

Model Diagnostics

Statistical Validation and Quality Metrics

DG

Model Diagnostics

Statistical Validation Metrics

30
Overall R-Squared

Statistical validation metrics for regression models including R-squared and confidence intervals

Product R_Squared Elasticity CI_Lower CI_Upper CI_Width Reliability
ADIDAS | CLASSIC BACKPACK 0.838 -0.92 -1.25 -0.59 0.66 Excellent
ADIDAS | CLASSIC BACKPACK | LEGEND INK MULTICOLOUR 0.869 -1.59 -2.09 -1.08 1.01 Excellent
ADIDAS | KID'S STAN SMITH 0.764 -1.35 -1.97 -0.74 1.23 Good
ADIDAS | SUPERSTAR 80S 0.858 -1.02 -1.36 -0.68 0.68 Excellent
ASICS TIGER | GEL-LYTE V '30 YEARS OF GEL' PACK 0.945 -1.79 -2.15 -1.44 0.70 Excellent
CONVERSE | CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR II HI 0.918 -1.45 -1.80 -1.09 0.70 Excellent
CONVERSE | CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR LO 0.727 -0.98 -1.48 -0.49 0.98 Good
CONVERSE | TODDLER CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR AXEL MID 0.809 -1.37 -1.91 -0.83 1.08 Excellent
DR MARTENS | 1460Z DMC 8-EYE BOOT | CHERRY SMOOTH 0.881 -1.64 -2.14 -1.15 0.99 Excellent
DR MARTENS | 1461 DMC 3-EYE SHOE | BLACK SMOOTH 0.940 -1.80 -2.17 -1.43 0.74 Excellent
DR MARTENS | CAVENDISH 3-EYE SHOE BLACK 0.920 -1.73 -2.14 -1.31 0.83 Excellent
FLEX FIT | MINI OTTOMAN BLACK 0.740 -0.79 -1.17 -0.41 0.76 Good
HERSCHEL | IONA 0.748 -1.91 -2.82 -1.01 1.81 Good
NIKE | CRACKLE PRINT TB TEE 0.791 -1.40 -1.99 -0.81 1.17 Good
NIKE | SWOOSH PRO FLAT PEAK CAP 0.962 -1.65 -1.92 -1.38 0.54 Excellent
NIKE | TODDLER ROSHE ONE 0.728 -0.92 -1.37 -0.46 0.91 Good
PALLADIUM | PALLATECH HI TX | CHEVRON 0.946 -1.92 -2.29 -1.55 0.75 Excellent
PUMA | SUEDE CLASSIC REGAL 0.961 -2.43 -2.83 -2.03 0.80 Excellent
SUPRA | MENS VAIDER 0.964 -2.17 -2.51 -1.83 0.68 Excellent
TIMBERLAND | MENS 6 INCH PREMIUM BOOT 0.635 -0.91 -1.47 -0.35 1.12 Good
VANS | ERA 59 MOROCCAN | GEO/DRESS BLUES 0.905 -1.48 -1.86 -1.09 0.78 Excellent
VANS | AUTHENTIC (BUTTERFLY) TRUE | WHITE / BLACK 0.957 -1.85 -2.17 -1.53 0.64 Excellent
VANS | AUTHENTIC | (MULTI EYELETS) | GRADIENT/CRIMSON 0.921 -1.67 -2.06 -1.27 0.80 Excellent
VANS | CLASSIC SLIP-ON (PERFORATED SUEDE) 0.930 -1.45 -1.78 -1.13 0.65 Excellent
VANS | ERA 59 (DESERT COWBOY) 0.908 -1.11 -1.39 -0.82 0.57 Excellent
VANS | OLD SKOOL (BUTTERFLY) TRUE WHITE | BLACK 0.890 -1.88 -2.41 -1.34 1.08 Excellent
VANS | SH-8 HI 0.934 -1.74 -2.11 -1.36 0.75 Excellent
VANS | SK8-HI DECON (CUTOUT)| LEAVES/WHITE 0.976 -2.08 -2.34 -1.82 0.53 Excellent
VANS |AUTHENTIC | LO PRO | BURGANDY/WHITE 0.892 -1.13 -1.45 -0.81 0.64 Excellent
VANS APPAREL AND ACCESSORIES | CLASSIC SUPER NO SHOW SOCKS 3 PACK WHITE 0.821 -1.08 -1.50 -0.67 0.82 Excellent
0.869
overall r squared
30
total products analyzed
IN

Key Insights

Model Diagnostics

Purpose

This section evaluates the model quality for all 30 products by assessing the overall R-squared value and the average elasticity. It highlights the importance of these metrics in understanding how well the model explains demand variations and the precision of elasticity estimates.

Key Findings

  • Overall R-squared: 0.869 - Indicates excellent model fit, with a high proportion of demand variation explained by price changes.
  • Average Elasticity: -1.507 - Represents the average responsiveness of demand to price changes across the analyzed products.
  • Reliability Ratings: Products with R-squared > 0.8 have excellent model fit and highly reliable elasticity estimates.

Interpretation

The high overall R-squared value suggests that the model effectively captures the relationship between prices and demand for the Shopify products. The average elasticity of -1.507 indicates that, on average, a 1% increase in price leads to a 1.507% decrease in quantity demanded. Products with reliable elasticity estimates can guide pricing strategies effectively.

Context

These metrics provide crucial insights into the effectiveness of the pricing strategy optimization based on price elasticity of demand. Understanding the reliability of elasticity estimates helps prioritize pricing adjustments for different products to maximize revenue and profitability.

IN

Key Insights

Model Diagnostics

Purpose

This section evaluates the model quality for all 30 products by assessing the overall R-squared value and the average elasticity. It highlights the importance of these metrics in understanding how well the model explains demand variations and the precision of elasticity estimates.

Key Findings

  • Overall R-squared: 0.869 - Indicates excellent model fit, with a high proportion of demand variation explained by price changes.
  • Average Elasticity: -1.507 - Represents the average responsiveness of demand to price changes across the analyzed products.
  • Reliability Ratings: Products with R-squared > 0.8 have excellent model fit and highly reliable elasticity estimates.

Interpretation

The high overall R-squared value suggests that the model effectively captures the relationship between prices and demand for the Shopify products. The average elasticity of -1.507 indicates that, on average, a 1% increase in price leads to a 1.507% decrease in quantity demanded. Products with reliable elasticity estimates can guide pricing strategies effectively.

Context

These metrics provide crucial insights into the effectiveness of the pricing strategy optimization based on price elasticity of demand. Understanding the reliability of elasticity estimates helps prioritize pricing adjustments for different products to maximize revenue and profitability.