Free — no account required

Do Your Groups Really Differ? Find Out In Minutes

Upload a CSV, pick your outcome and your groups, and get the complete comparison — t-test or ANOVA, nonparametric cross-checks, effect sizes, and exactly which groups differ. Free.

24,000+ analyses run
Encrypted & deleted in 7 days
PDF & citation included

Drop your CSV here

or click to browse · max 3 MB

📊
-
Rows
-
Columns
-
Numeric

Running group comparison — t-test, anova & nonparametric analysis...

Comparing your groups...

Your report is ready

Sent to — group boxplot, group statistics, the full test battery with effect sizes, pairwise differences, R code, and AI insights.

Analyze another file
Sample Output

Every report includes interactive charts, tables, and AI insights

Upload your data to get your own report

View all case studies See all free tools

How it works

The analysis compares your numeric outcome across the groups you define, running the full standard toolkit at once. For two groups: Welch's t-test (the robust default), Student's t-test, and the Mann-Whitney U test, plus Cohen's d for effect size. For three or more: one-way ANOVA, Welch's ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis test, plus eta-squared and Tukey HSD pairwise comparisons. A normality check on the residuals decides whether the parametric or nonparametric result is the safer headline.

Use it whenever you have one numeric measure and a column that splits rows into groups — experiment variants, regions, plans, cohorts — and want to know if the difference is real and how big it is.

Not for comparing two categorical columns (use a chi-square / categorical association tool), for paired before/after measurements on the same subjects, or for outcomes that are counts of rare events.

Built for: Analysts, product managers, and operators comparing a metric across segments or experiment arms

Typical data source: Any spreadsheet or CSV with a numeric column and a group/segment/variant column

E-commerceMarketingSaaSOperationsResearchHealthcare

What data do you need?

One numeric outcome plus one group column. For example, weekly sales by store region:

store_region (categorical) weekly_sales (numeric)
Region A 53.99
Region B 61.19
Region C 40.1

Minimum 10 rows · Best with 30-50,000 rows and 2-8 groups

What's in the report?

Standard-library analysis: does a numeric outcome differ between groups? One deck runs the whole toolkit — Welch and Student t-tests for two groups, one-way and Welch ANOVA for three or more, plus Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric checks, effect sizes (Cohen's d, eta-squared), and pairwise differences with confidence intervals — and tells you which result to trust for your data.

📦

Outcome by Group

The outcome's distribution in every group side by side — separation between boxes is the visual version of the significance test.

📋

Group Statistics

Each group's sample size, mean with 95% confidence interval, spread, and median in one table.

📋

Statistical Tests

Every test run — parametric and nonparametric — with statistics, p-values, and effect sizes, so you can see whether the verdicts agree.

📋

Which Groups Differ

Exactly which group pairs differ, by how much, with confidence intervals and multiplicity-adjusted p-values.

🤖

AI Insights

Plain-English interpretation — what the numbers mean, what's significant, and what to do next.

The Question This Answers

Did my experiment actually work?

Map your metric as the outcome and the variant column as the group. You get the significance verdict, the size of the lift with a confidence interval, and a nonparametric cross-check in one report.

Questions?

See our FAQ for details on pricing, data privacy, and how the analysis works. Every report includes a Methodology section showing the statistical test, assumptions checked, and diagnostics run.

Your data has more stories to tell

Run any analysis on your own data — validated R analyses, interactive reports, AI insights, and PDF export.

Try Free — No Credit Card
Powered by MCP Analytics